Related Articles

6 Comments

  1. 1

    Grrrowler

    The front facade isn’t bad, if you ignore the garage wing jutting out and ruining the balance of the whole thing. The interior is dark and dated, and wasn’t anything special to begin with. Whoever took the pics needs to learn how to properly light interior photos. I can say that it’s a lot of house for the money, if someone is interested in size over style.

    Reply
  2. 2

    Daniel

    Ick. Dead grass. How dreadful. The home ain’t gonna win awards, but it’s a perfectly reasonable family home.

    Reply
  3. 3

    NOVA Ben

    Entirely predictable for GA, but also entirely ignorable. I disagree with Grrrowler on the facade, I think it’s awful. The large expanses of glass with no latticework (I think the word is “muntin”?) to break it up just makes a home seem soulless, and even besides that, the window choices don’t go well together. The rear facade is better but still unremarkable.

    Interior is completely forgettable and quite dated. The kitchen is due for a gutting, but that two-story area adjacent to the kitchen isn’t as easy to fix and looks heinous. No thank you.

    Reply
    1. 3.1

      ZigZagBoom

      Yes, the facade is hideous. Atlanta can do much better.

      Reply
  4. 4

    Marie

    Good price for home amount. Inside looks to dark. Reminds of one of those homes an athlete past their prime tries to unload to save money.

    Reply
  5. 5

    Venom

    Yep, good house for the money, standard Georgia home. Definitely get that ex-athlete vibe also.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2014 Homes of the Rich - All Rights Reserved

css.php